Interesting results, but nothing suprising. All shot at ISO 800, on D80. These are 100% unedited besides matching of color temperature. Shot RAW. No VR. No Filters.

1st: full frame | 2nd: 100% crop | 3rd: bokeh 100% crop

28mm 2.8 @ 2.8 (E-Series, manual focus)

For being wide open this lens is damn sharp. Not horrible bokeh, a bit “doughnutish,” but not nice enough when compared to some other lenses that have fantastic bokeh(85 1.4…). Stopped down this is wiiiicked sharp. If you don’t have focus, it really shows it. Fairly large DoF for 2.8 because of the focal length.

50mm 1.8 @ 1.8

Not as sharp as the 28mm, but still this is pretty good for the aperture. We can’t say it’s also because it’s cheaper, because it really isn’t. Only difference with this lens and the 28 is that this is over 1 stop faster, longer length and has AF. Bokeh is a bit ugly, almost like a crescent moon, which is annoying. I don’t mind it too much, but it might be a bad copy… who knows. I’m not worried about it.

50mm 1.8 @ 2.0

Almost the same as at 1.8. Only stopped down 1/3 of a stop here, but sharpness was improved a little and bokeh seems to be about the same, although ever so slightly less rounded, but more round. (more of an overall even circle, but more like a hexagon)

50 1.8 @ 2.8

Just proof how cheap lenses can look great stopped down. This is pretty sharp. Bokeh has changed a lot, obviously, but still looks pretty good. Check out the full frame and see what you think! Creamy bokeh that isn’t as destracting in my opinion as at f/1.8 or f/2.0.

18-55 3.5-5.6 @ 24mm, 4.0

wow. This is the kit lens at it’s maximum aperature for this focal length. If you can’t tell the difference here, look very close at the letters on the can. Crisp clean lines, that’s what’s important. Granted this was shot at f/4, a full stop off anything else. You might notice some barrel distortion here, but I don’t worry about that too much, it’s a zoom. There are reasons why this is still in my arsenal, because it’s sharp, cheap, VR, and zoom. If you don’t need a shallow depth of field or low light performance, no reason to not keep this lens as a spare, or in my case, if you can’t afford much else. 🙂

I think that’s about it. Feel free to email me if you have any questions. Jackson [at] drivetoescape.com

Thursday, July 9th, 2009 @ 2:08 am Uncategorized